|





























UTD In
the News
CBS4
(August 21, 2008)
OpEd: Legislators missed lesson of book 'A Nation at Risk'
Tallahassee Democrat
(April 25, 2008)
Focus on South
Florida
WFOR - CBS 4
(March 23, 2008)
Miami-Dade Teachers
protest health insurance
The Miami Herald
(March 12, 2008)
Study: Fla.
education funding
affecting high wage jobs
WSVN - Fox 7 News
(Feb. 28, 2008)
(Feb. 2, 2008)
AFL-CIO Pushes for ‘No’ vote For
Amendment 1
WPLG - Local 10
(Jan. 17, 2008)
Miami 'Zone' Gives Schools
Intensive Help
"Education Week"
(Oct. 17, 2007)




| |
To: School Board Member [insert name]
From: Karen Aronowitz, United Teachers
of Dade
Date: June 17, 2008
RE: Agenda Item A-3
I am providing you with additional
information that you may not have known regarding the district’s
presentation of agenda item A-3. United Teachers of Dade stands in
opposition to this agenda item.
-
The plan before you was designed
entirely by MEP Administrators and one parent without the input
of unions of impacted employees. While MEP administrators
receive furlough days, impacted employees, including teachers
who have direct contact with our students, are subject to
surplus, Reduction in Force or reduction in contract length
while administrators face none of these conditions. There is no
reduction in contract length for MEP administrators even though
most schools are not operating during the summer.
-
Reduction in contract length for
psychologists, for example, puts the district out of compliance
with federal regulations requiring testing and placement of
students within specific time frames. The same is true for our
ESE staffing specialists.
-
A serious safety issue for our
teachers and students exists with the proposed changes to
Physical Education Allocations. Currently, PE teacher
allocations are not done by student-teacher ratio, but by the
number of classes assigned to them. For example, 13:1 means that
the PE teacher is assigned 13 classes per day – 10 classes per
day, 3 of which are double classes = approximately 325
students. If you approve A-3, the ratio would be 16:1, 10
classes per day, 6 double class periods = 425 students daily.
There are many examples of why we
oppose item A-3 but most importantly, you are being asked to make
decisions about the budget on a piecemeal basis without adequate
detail about the repercussions to the students of Miami-Dade County
Public Schools.
We find none of the efficiencies
presented by any union or the public considered in reducing costs to
the district. Until such time as cost-saving measures offered by
UTD and others in our community are part of a total plan, we oppose
any Reduction in Force for the UTD bargaining unit.
Last month, the Board approved E-14
allowing for certain changes to be made to the K-12 allocation. The
entire manual of these changes will not be available for your
approval until sometime over the summer. You are forced to make
decisions without understanding the entire impact to our students
and employees.
|
|